Boston Tea Party 12.16.2007
Written by David on December 15th, 2007 with
8 comments.
Read more articles on General Talk.
- [+] Digg: Feature this article
- [+] Del.icio.us: Bookmark this article
- [+] Furl: Bookmark this article
Written by David on December 15th, 2007 with
8 comments.
Read more articles on General Talk.
Read the comments left by other users below, or:
Steve Miller TX
#2.
December 18th, 2007, at 11:08 AM.
One of the more interesting aspects of Ron Paul’s run is that it really exposes how the mainstream media control and manipulate this country through selective dissimination of controlled information. We’ve seen that with the Iraq war coverage as every single bit of it has been focused entirely on the negative and magnified for effect. Anything positive is never shown despite the press taking tours of rebuilding projects, humanitarian efforts, and the heroic efforts of our military. This has been clearly documented. The days of true journalism, where both sides of a story are reported fairly, are dead. What we see alot of is slanted and biased coverage always favoring liberals and democrats…no surprise since most in the industry are of that political mindset.
The presidential election was already decided by the media a long time ago: Hillary vs Rudy. That’s pretty much the only news stories we’ve seen…despite their ranking in the polls. Coverage of the other candidates has purposely been squelched. Ron Paul continues to mystify the media has he is often out-raising the other candidates thus showing his deep, growing popularity.
Despite all of that, the media continues to downplay him and largely tries to ignore him. They truly don’t believe most people are capable of thinking for themselves and it’s a real insult to our collective intelligence. THANK GOD for the internet which is perforating the shield of the mainstream media. Ron Paul is making serious headway despite the media’s attempt to suppress him.
I’ll be voting for him without hesitation. I’ve known about him for about 8 yeas now since I abandoned both political prties in 2000 to become more Libertarian. Ron Paul is a Libertarian in Republican’s clothing.
We need to get back to the very roots and foundation on what this county was founded on. We the people need to rise up and take back our government. Electing Ron Paul is the first step towards that and is the only peaceful solution. The problem we’ve seen in this coutnry are liberals and conservative fighting to “take back” their version of what this country should be. Ron Paul is the only candidate whose ideas and leadership transcends both political hemispheres.
The current political establishment and the mainstream media aren’t taking notice of Congress’ dismal 20% or less approval rating or the continued decline of the mainstream media’s stanglehold. Why should they when they are in complete control? Well, the revolution is underway and hopefully is bigger than they are.
RON PAUL IN 2008!!!
David
#3.
December 18th, 2007, at 11:29 AM.
I was just about to post a new entry about Ron Paul and what has happened since the huge Tea Party on Sunday. Ron Paul is now the 6 million dollar man!
As I saw in one commentary on youtube, which rain drop will it be that finally breaks the dam? All of us and everything we do is another drop of that rain. Sooner or later, the dam will break.
Awesome to hear you are already a Ron Paul supporter, and more importantly a supporter of the message!
David
#4.
December 18th, 2007, at 2:25 PM.
The tide on the media coverage may have changed today Steve. I see now on the FRONT PAGE of CNN.com as I post this, a lead story about his $6 million Tea Party Fundraiser this past Sunday.
Darin
#5.
December 23rd, 2007, at 3:05 PM.
From Paul…..“I have never been one who is comfortable talking about my faith in the political arena. In fact, the pandering that typically occurs in the election season I find to be distasteful. But for those who have asked, I freely confess that Jesus Christ is my personal Savior, and that I seek His guidance in all that I do. I know, as you do, that our freedoms come not from man, but from God.”
Never been comfortable? He should stand up for what he believes in, even if it will cost him some votes. It seems to me that he doesn’t want to come fully out about his religious beliefs(until forced to do so) because he is too busy trying to please everyone. This side of him just seems to be a little sketchy though and makes me wonder if he did get elected, how much stuff that he is going to expose, that would piss a lot of people off because he is not coming clean about it now. I also find the statement about him seeking guidance in everything that he does from god to be absurd. I really don’t want an invisible man in the clouds leading our country. Our freedoms DO NOT come from god. All things considered though, I do think that if Paul would leave religion out of his agenda, he could be a good president if elected.
David
#6.
December 23rd, 2007, at 4:31 PM.
The reason he doesn’t feel comfortable talking about his personal faith in the political arena, is because he believes the it detracts from the issues that need to be talked about, which aren’t religion. He strongly believes in freedom of (or from) religion, whatever is your choice, even if it isn’t his own personal choice. He hasn’t hid anything about what he believes, he just believes it should not be a running point for an election, which if I read your comment right Darin, that would support what you believe.
I’m not sure where you got the idea he’s trying to please everyone. His message and stance on issues has been clear, and his voting record in congress has been consistent. In fact, it really upsets a lot of the neocons because they want things to continue as they are, and he wants to get back to small government, and give the people ALL their freedoms back and get the government out of our lives.
From everything I have seen on him, he never brings up the issue of faith unless asked about it first. He would rather talk about the issues.
On the other hand, you have Romney and Huckabee throwing their faith around all over the place, and not really talking about the issues much.
Darin
#7.
December 23rd, 2007, at 9:03 PM.
Point taken David…I am Libertarian and do agree with Paul on some of the big issues.
The point I was trying to make though, is that religion is a big issue in itself, and needs to be addressed before the election. If one’s personal faith is going to have any effect at all on the decisions that he makes while in the office, then there’s no reason to shy away from it now. If Romney and Huckabee throw out their religious views….more power to them lol.
As you probably figured out, I am an atheist, and that’s why religion is a big issue for me. At the same time, I don’t believe in infringing on anyone’s rights to practice religion if they choose to do so but I fully believe in complete separation between church and state. If Paul gets elected I think that some of his traditional values of the right will come storming back in and will have deceived a lot of people because he is hiding behind his invisible religious cloak. That would not be very Libertarian of him.
“The Government of the United States is not in any sense founded upon the Christian Religion.” —–George Washington
“I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, disciplines or exercises.” —–Thomas Jefferson
Why would our founding fathers say this? Because there were so many problems dealing with religion in England, that they knew the way for a government to be more successful is to have religion remain a private matter. This totally contradicts what Paul is ‘preaching’, if he truly wants our country “to get back to the very roots and foundation on what this county was founded on.”
He is not avoiding religion to concentrate on bigger issues….he is avoiding it because he knows that using his Christian faith as a tool in the oval office would make him a total hypocrite and go against everything that he wants you and I to believe he is trying to change. For this reason, I will not vote for him.
David
#8.
December 24th, 2007, at 12:40 AM.
I understand your concern, but I really don’t believe he’s trying to hide behind anything. He’s made it clear what his beliefs are. He’s also made it clear that he keeps them out of political business. He votes on things in Congress based entirely on whether or not he thinks they are constitutional. His 10 terms in congress is unwaivering on that.
It sounds like you won’t be voting for anyone however, because as far as I know, all of the candidates have expressed a faith in God.
I am not big on organized religion, but there are far more important issues in this country that need to be handled NOW, why we still have some freedoms left to make a difference. On that reason alone I am not going to get overly concerned about if our President prays in the White House.
If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:
You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Stay current with In The Vortex on these personalized pages:
#1. December 15th, 2007, at 1:49 PM.
http://thevulgarunicorn.com/?p=187